Publication

Legal Foundation: The Critical Issue of Licensing Compliance Before the Start of Mining Operations

Yosie Monoarfa, S.H., CPS., CMLC., Founding Partner of Jurist Terra & Co., provided legal counsel to the Director and Management of PT Bolmong Timur Primanusa Resources (PT BTPR) during their attendance at a Public Hearing (RDPU) with the East Bolaang Mongondow (Boltim) Regency Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD), the Boltim Police Department, the North Sulawesi Provincial Government, and community members on Thursday, June 12, 2025. This RDPU addressed follow-up actions regarding community reports of mining activities in the Garini Forest area, Buyat Barat Village, Kotabunan Subdistrict. The Garini area is prone to illegal gold mining (PETI) activities, and some parts of it are suspected to be located within protected forest areas or areas that should be protected. The RDPU focused on alleged mining conflicts and unauthorized activities by other companies in the area, with the main issues being expired permits and operations within forest areas. In the mining industry, the greatest risk is not commodity price fluctuations or geological challenges, but rather legal and regulatory risks. Our experience in assisting clients, including in the dynamics of RDPU in regions such as Boltim, confirms that the absence or defect in a single permit document can trigger the suspension of operations, the

Read More »

Strengthening the Pillar of Integrity: Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Briefing for Jombang Regency Government Agencies

A Strategic Milestone Toward Clean Governance On July 7, 2025, Rini Ismiati, S.H., M.Kn., CLMC, Founding Partner of Jurist Terra & Co, delivered a briefing to all Regional Government Agencies (OPDs) in Jombang Regency regarding the implementation of Good Governance and the prevention of corruption to achieve clean, transparent, and accountable governance. Literally, “Good Governance” translates to “Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik.” This concept goes beyond mere efficient administration; it refers to the process by which power and authority are used to manage a nation’s social and economic resources for development. In the context of administrative law, the implementation of Good Governance is not merely a policy choice but a constitutional mandate and a normative obligation. The principles of good governance—such as transparency, accountability, participation, the rule of law, and efficiency—are enshrined in various regulations, including: In “Governance for Sustainable Human Development,” the UNDP identifies nine key characteristics that a governance system must possess to be categorized as Good Governance. These nine pillars often serve as the primary benchmarks for assessing the quality of governance: The emphasis on good governance is the first line of defense (a preventive measure) against corruption. If the basic principles of governance are properly implemented,

Read More »

RPPLH: The Legal Foundation for Sustainable Development and Local Environmental Compliance

Legal Momentum Toward a Sustainable Ecoregion The implementation of the Environmental Protection and Management Plan (RPPLH) has become a crucial legal mandate for every local government in Indonesia. The RPPLH is not merely a technical planning document, but a strategic legal instrument that bridges economic development with the environment’s carrying capacity and resilience. This RPPLH document serves as a long-term roadmap (typically spanning 30 years) for the region to ensure that environmental protection and management are carried out in a systematic, integrated, and sustainable manner. Legally, the existence of the RPPLH is mandated by Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management (PPLH Law). Article 10 of the Environmental Protection and Management Act explicitly requires the central government and local governments to formulate an RPPLH. This document serves as a roadmap that outlines environmental potentials, environmental issues, and efforts for their protection and management over a thirty-year period, to be evaluated every five years. The RPPLH as a Mandate and Legal Instrument Within the development planning hierarchy, the RPPLH plays a strategic role as the basis for the formulation of Regional Spatial Plans (RTRW) and Regional Long-Term/Medium-Term Development Plans (RPJPD/RPJMD). This integration is reinforced by Government Regulation No.

Read More »

FPIC: From Social Ethics to a De Facto Obligation in the Mining Industry in Indonesia

An Analysis of the Complexities of Domestic Law and the Foundations of Customary Rights In the context of land acquisition by private mining companies—particularly when the targeted area consists of customary lands located within forest areas—the application of the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) is a central and complex legal issue. Under Indonesian domestic law, the absolute obligation of FPIC has not been explicitly regulated in the Land Law for purely private land acquisition transactions (transfer of rights). However, Indonesia’s legal framework provides strong support for the recognition of the rights of Indigenous Communities (MHA), which indirectly mandates a process equivalent to FPIC. This recognition of ILC rights is rooted in Article 18B, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, which acknowledges and respects the unity of Indigenous Legal Communities along with their traditional rights. Article 3 of Law No. 5 of 1960 on Agrarian Principles (UUPA) also normatively recognizes customary land rights and similar rights of Indigenous Legal Communities (MHA) over land, provided that such rights still exist in practice and their use does not conflict with national interests or higher-ranking laws and regulations. Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs (Permendagri) No. 52 of 2014 on

Read More »

Cross-Border M&A in Indonesia: Legal Framework, Trends, and Practical Risks

Rising Cross-Border M&A Activity in Indonesia In recent years, Indonesia has seen a significant increase in cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions, in line with investment regulatory reforms through the Omnibus Law and the implementation of the risk-based licensing system (OSS-RBA). These reforms have fundamentally transformed Indonesia’s investment legal landscape, making it more open, efficient, and competitive for foreign investors. Cross-border M&A has become a strategic tool for global investors to gain market access, acquire strategic assets, expand regionally, and optimize ownership and control structures. Sectors such as renewable energy, infrastructure, technology, manufacturing, and electric vehicles (EVs) are key areas of interest for foreign investors. However, cross-border transactions in Indonesia still require a deep understanding of the corporate and investment legal frameworks, as well as sector-specific regulations, to mitigate post-acquisition legal and operational risks. The Legal Framework for Cross-Border M&A in Indonesia Normatively, cross-border M&A transactions in Indonesia are primarily governed by: The replacement of the Negative Investment List (DNI) with the Positive Investment List (DPI) has expanded the business sectors open to foreign ownership, thereby broadening the scope for structuring M&A transactions. However, foreign ownership limits and sector-specific licensing requirements still need to be carefully examined in every transaction.

Read More »

Changes to Small-Scale Mining Regulations: An Analysis of the Legal Framework for IPR and the Designation of WPR in the Latest Regulations

Introduction In recent years, the Indonesian government has increasingly strengthened the regulatory framework for small-scale mining as part of efforts to regulate small-scale mining activities, which have largely been conducted informally. One of the key instruments within this framework is the Small-Scale Mining Area (WPR) and the issuance of Small-Scale Mining Permits (IPR) to local communities. Mining regulatory reforms triggered by amendments to Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining—as amended by Law No. 3 of 2020—have significant implications for the governance of community-based mining. In addition, various implementing regulations issued by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) also clarify the procedures for designating areas and the mechanisms for granting permits to community mining operators. In practice, the delineation of WPRs and the issuance of IPRs are not only related to granting rights to communities but are also closely tied to environmental control, legal certainty, and the integration of small-scale mining activities into the national mining governance system. This Client Update aims to provide an overview of regulatory developments regarding the designation of WPRs and the granting of IPRs, including their implications for mining operators, local governments, and communities engaged in small-scale mining activities. Legal

Read More »